Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
christensenleif@msn.com  
#1 Posted : Monday, January 4, 2010 3:02:14 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

hello have looked at the photo of your new buffalo pcb and the small pcb in the center on top of main dac pcb between mono IVYII boards is really interesting!
after zooming and rotating it looks as if it´s got 2 Digital in and the 2 LEDs at each end indicates that it might be a sort of switching/control device? maybe for autodetecting between dsd and pcm?Think or what kind of secret device might it be?
just very curious
best
Leif
Norway
Beefy  
#2 Posted : Monday, January 4, 2010 7:13:21 AM(UTC)
Beefy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/9/2008(UTC)
Posts: 62

It looks to me like there is only one power input to the DAC board. Thus I suspect the new PCB is a way of deriving Va or some other voltage reference.
christensenleif@msn.com  
#3 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 1:55:45 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

do you not only need VD to the main Dac pcb and one VA to each mono IVY II ?
best
Leif
PressPlay  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 6:28:12 AM(UTC)
PressPlay

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 12/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 14
Location: UK

I think it might be a super reg Whistle
Beefy  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 7:45:08 AM(UTC)
Beefy

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 5/9/2008(UTC)
Posts: 62

christensenleif@msn.com wrote:
do you not only need VD to the main Dac pcb and one VA to each mono IVY II ?
best
Leif


I believe that the DAC chip itself needs analogue voltage, or at least a voltage reference. If you look at the first Buffalo (DAC board only, no onboard IVY), you had both Vd and Va supplied by separate power terminals.

For Buffalo32S, I would guess that Va for the DAC was taken from the positive rail of the analogue supplies; the positive rail's current draw is stated as 25mA higher than the negative rail.

For Buffalo II, I can't see where Va is coming from. There doesn't seem to be any analogue voltage input, or supply from the IVY II. So this new PCB is an obvious contender.

Edited by user Tuesday, January 5, 2010 7:46:11 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

christensenleif@msn.com  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 1:12:38 PM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

sounds sensible...I remember wondering about the difference in current draw on the + and - side
anyway...in a few days we´ll know for sure
best
Leif
NicMac  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 5:00:15 PM(UTC)
NicMac

Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 2/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 299
Location: Italy

It gotta be a psu for Va. Russ mentioned something about new small supply coming up together with the Buffalo II.
I just hope it won't get fried sitting there right over the Sabre chip.
Nic
Russ White  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, January 5, 2010 8:21:32 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Hi Guys :)

As some of you have surmised, the little mystery PCB is indeed a little dual shunt regulated AVCC power supply. It supplies the left and right AVCC supply pins of the DAC. It is a optimized version of the placid circuit especially tweaked for this application.

The Buffalo II board is very different from the original Buffalo. This will be very obvious when you get a good look at it.

I am extremely pleased with it so far.

The DAC only requires one external voltage supply (though its is possible to use more, but not worth it IMO). Here is why. Local regulation and good layout and isolation. :) Plain and simple, all you will need is a single placid (or similar good PS) for VD.

Of course the IVY does require a bipolar supply as expected. You can use one or two Placid BP for that task.

Cheers!
Russ

Edited by user Tuesday, January 5, 2010 9:09:21 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

christensenleif@msn.com  
#9 Posted : Wednesday, January 6, 2010 1:19:07 AM(UTC)
christensenleif@msn.com

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 11/21/2008(UTC)
Posts: 314
Location: Norway

great !
looking fw to build the new dac
best
Leif "patience" Christensen
Norway
Karlosak  
#10 Posted : Wednesday, January 6, 2010 4:50:54 AM(UTC)
Karlosak

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/4/2009(UTC)
Posts: 17
Location: Prague, Czech Republic, EU

Nice!
May I kindly ask for the dimensions of the new Buffalo and IVY boards? I would like to play a bit with space considerations in my current enclosure and be ready when this marvel comes out! Boo hoo!

Edited by user Wednesday, January 6, 2010 4:54:53 AM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

kesgreen  
#11 Posted : Thursday, January 7, 2010 3:27:52 PM(UTC)
kesgreen

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 1/12/2009(UTC)
Posts: 138
Location: London

Thanks: 15 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Karlosak wrote:
Nice!
May I kindly ask for the dimensions of the new Buffalo and IVY boards? I would like to play a bit with space considerations in my current enclosure and be ready when this marvel comes out! Boo hoo!


Quoting Brian from the homepage:

Quote:
"The new version ("Buffalo II") is the same size as the original Buffalo (2" x 3.3"), and the same size as our other digital modules, which allows for easy stacking."
Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
GuestUser
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.