Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
soundcheck  
#1 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2008 3:30:34 AM(UTC)
soundcheck

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 13

Hi folks.

Sorry for all my newbie questions.


I am currently running a 1543 based DAC with passive I/V (100R) out. It is directly coupled to my amp ( just one coupling-cap on the amp input).

Can I accomplish this also with the Buffalo DAC? How would that have look like? What would be the best approach?



THX
Russ White  
#2 Posted : Sunday, August 10, 2008 5:13:39 PM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
Hi,

Well this is the interesting thing. The ESS DAC is not like most current output DACs. It truly behaves like a voltage output with a series resistance of 195 ohms. As such, no passive I/V is really required or desired, and in fact would just make thinks worse. Just use the voltage output directly for the simplest possible solution.

Cheers!
Russ
soundcheck  
#3 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2008 2:02:06 AM(UTC)
soundcheck

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 13



I am looking forward to try this.

One more question:

Do I have to bridge GND and minus if running unbalanced SE output on the Buffalo DAC board or should I leave the minus open?


THX
Russ White  
#4 Posted : Monday, August 11, 2008 11:55:01 AM(UTC)
Russ White

Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Customer
Joined: 10/24/2006(UTC)
Posts: 3,979
Location: Nashville, TN

Thanks: 25 times
Was thanked: 89 time(s) in 83 post(s)
I would leave it open.
sopiblack  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:17:22 AM(UTC)
sopiblack

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 7/8/2008(UTC)
Posts: 3
Location: Denmark

Russ White wrote:
I would leave it open.

Hi when can i preorder buffalo and haiku.
soundcheck  
#6 Posted : Sunday, August 17, 2008 3:29:14 AM(UTC)
soundcheck

Rank: Member

Groups: Member
Joined: 8/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 13


My current 1543 based DAC is still kind of less aggressive. Break-in time for Buffalo?

I am wondering if I need to apply the HF-filter to the output. You introduced an HF filter to the IVY recently to cope with the HF junk on the Buffalo output - right? Or do I mix up things here?
I'd appreciate if you could post how it looks like. For the future it's maybe a good idea to put that filter on the DAC board.

I am having BG caps installed in my old chain, which are known for its natural fluid sound. Perhaps I need to checkout your PS buffer caps fireing the analog out of the Sabre chip.


Rss Feed  Atom Feed
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.